Customer Reviews (100)

YH Teh • 2025-03-21T01:47:24.232Z

One of the best looking and functional watch face for my Galaxy Watch Ultra

Marshall Rody (Herbert) • 2025-03-16T13:47:07.717Z

This is an awesome watch face for me (Pixel Watch 3). You may have to resort to edits directly on the watch. This is not an issue with the watch face. I have worked with Google on this issue. As stated, the Pixel Watch 3 is communicating with the phone over Bluetooth, and it is slow and prone to issues.

Harsha Varma Dantuluri • 2025-03-16T02:31:59.133Z

I like it. some lags are there in the app, while customising it hangs and sometimes app is exiting from wear app directly. but it's fine.

Summary of Key Insights

The S4U Assen watch face is generally well-received for its realistic hybrid design, customization options, and functionality. However, a significant number of users experience issues with customization (particularly through the phone app), battery drain, and installation problems. While many users praise the design and customization, the reported bugs and performance issues detract from the overall experience. The overall sentiment is positive, but the negative reviews highlight critical areas needing attention.

Overall Rating: Approximately 4.14/5 (based on the score distribution) Score Distribution: 5-star (57%), 4-star (14%), 3-star (4%), 2-star (4%), 1-star (21%)

Key Strengths:

  • Aesthetic design and realistic look
  • Extensive customization options (colors, hands, complications, shortcuts)
  • Useful information display
  • AOD functionality

Key Weaknesses:

  • Customization issues (freezing, crashing, especially on the phone app)
  • Battery drain
  • Installation problems
  • AOD brightness too low for some users
  • Heart rate dial functionality issues for some users

Data & Methodology Overview

  • Data Sample Size: 100 reviews
  • Time Frame: Not explicitly stated, but assumed to be recent based on the mention of Galaxy Watch Ultra and Pixel Watch 3.
  • Analysis Methods: Primarily qualitative analysis of user reviews, focusing on identifying recurring themes, sentiments, and feature requests. Quantitative data from the star rating distribution was also used. Keyword extraction was implicitly performed to identify key issues and strengths.

Key User Pain Points

  • Customization Issues (High Priority): Many users report that the customization feature freezes or crashes, especially when using the Wear OS app on their phones. Some users can only customize directly on the watch. This significantly impacts the user experience and is a recurring theme.
  • Battery Drain (High Priority): A significant number of users report excessive battery drain when using this watch face, even with AOD turned off.
  • Installation Problems (Medium Priority): Some users experience difficulty installing the watch face on their watches, even when using compatible devices.
  • AOD Brightness (Medium Priority): Several users complain that the AOD brightness is too low, making it difficult to see in certain lighting conditions.
  • Heart Rate Dial Inaccuracy (Low Priority): Some users report that the heart rate dial displays inaccurate readings.

Frequently Requested Features

  • Increased AOD Brightness: Several users explicitly request a brighter AOD option.
  • Night Mode: One user suggested a night mode option.
  • More Color Options: Some users desire a wider range of color choices for customization.
  • Option to Remove Hands: One user requested the ability to remove the hands for a cleaner look.
  • Improved AOD Options (Arrows Only): A user suggested a simple AOD mode with only arrows to reduce background noise.
  • Combine features from other S4U watch faces: One user suggested combining features from other S4U watch faces (Assen LCD, Shift graphics, and Dive battery gauge).

Strengths and Positive Aspects

  • Realistic and Appealing Design: Users consistently praise the watch face's realistic and stylish design.
  • Extensive Customization: The wide range of customization options (colors, hands, complications) is a major draw for many users.
  • Functionality: Users appreciate the useful information displayed on the watch face, including time, steps, heart rate, and notifications.
  • AOD Mode: The presence of an always-on display mode is a positive feature for many users.
  • Premium Look: Users frequently mention the watch face gives a premium and classy look.

Prioritized Action Recommendations

  • High Priority:
    • Fix Customization Issues: Investigate and resolve the freezing/crashing issues during customization, particularly within the Wear OS phone app. This is the most frequently reported problem.
    • Optimize Battery Consumption: Identify and address the excessive battery drain issue. Profile the watch face's power usage and optimize code to minimize drain.
  • Medium Priority:
    • Increase AOD Brightness: Provide an option to increase the AOD brightness or offer different brightness levels.
    • Improve Installation Process: Investigate and resolve the installation problems reported by some users. Ensure clear instructions and troubleshooting steps are readily available.
  • Low Priority:
    • Address Heart Rate Dial Issues: Investigate and resolve the reported inaccuracies with the heart rate dial.
    • Add Requested Features: Consider implementing the most frequently requested features, such as more color options, a night mode, and an option to remove the hands.

Opportunities for Startup Ideas

  • Watch Face Customization SDK: Develop an SDK that allows watch face developers to easily integrate robust and reliable customization features into their apps, addressing the common problem of customization issues.
  • Battery Optimization Tool for Watch Faces: Create a tool that analyzes watch faces and identifies potential areas for battery optimization, helping developers create more power-efficient designs.
  • Modular Watch Face Platform: A platform where users can mix and match different elements from various watch faces (e.g., hands from one, complications from another) to create highly personalized designs.

Trends and Observations

  • Customization Issues are a Major Deterrent: The recurring theme of customization problems significantly impacts user satisfaction and prevents some users from fully enjoying the watch face.
  • Battery Life is a Key Concern: Battery drain is a critical factor for watch face adoption. Watch faces that significantly impact battery life are likely to receive negative reviews.
  • Positive Sentiment Despite Issues: Despite the reported problems, many users still express positive sentiment towards the watch face's design and features, indicating a strong underlying appeal.
  • Direct Customization on Watch is Preferred: Some users have found success customizing directly on the watch itself, suggesting a possible workaround or preferred method, which could be highlighted in the app's description.

Conclusion

The S4U Assen watch face has a strong foundation with its appealing design and customization options. However, the reported customization issues and battery drain significantly detract from the overall user experience. Addressing these issues should be the top priority. By resolving these problems and considering the requested features, the developer can significantly improve user satisfaction and solidify the watch face's position as a top choice for Wear OS users.

Overall Recommendation: Focus on bug fixing and performance optimization before adding new features. Prioritize resolving customization issues and battery drain.

Original App Link

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.watchfacestudio.s4uassen